Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Feb 23, 2023·Amalie Arena, Tampa

Buffalo Sabres 6, Tampa Bay Lightning 5 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 84% of the time.

TBL winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
BUF123131711623
TBL1911031804541

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:19TBLSteven StamkosAssists: Brayden Point, Nikita Kucherov · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P1 11:41BUFZemgus GirgensonsAssists: Rasmus Dahlin, Tyson Jost · Deflected, 0.08 xG1–1
  3. P2 9:36BUFTage ThompsonPPAssists: Jeff Skinner, Rasmus Dahlin · Wrist, 0.15 xG2–1
  4. P2 12:20BUFTage ThompsonAssists: Jeff Skinner · Wrist, 0.12 xG3–1
  5. P2 12:36TBLVictor HedmanAssists: Patrick Maroon, Nick Paul · Slap, 0.09 xG3–2
  6. P2 13:25BUFJack QuinnAssists: Peyton Krebs, Casey Mittelstadt · Wrist, 0.08 xG4–2
  7. P3 5:48TBLBrayden PointAssists: Victor Hedman, Brandon Hagel · Backhand, 0.08 xG4–3
  8. P3 6:18BUFTage ThompsonUnassisted · Wrist, 0.17 xG5–3
  9. P3 8:33TBLAnthony CirelliAssists: Erik Cernak, Brayden Point · Poke, 0.16 xG5–4
  10. P3 14:54TBLRoss ColtonPPAssists: Steven Stamkos, Brayden Point · Slap, 0.11 xG5–5
  11. OT 1:41BUFIlya LyubushkinSHGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.00 xG6–5
Penalties (5)
  1. P2 0:24TBLBrandon Hagel: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 6:26BUFMattias Samuelsson: Holding2 min
  3. P2 8:51TBLNick Paul: Interference2 min · PPG
  4. P3 13:45BUFCasey Mittelstadt: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
  5. P3 19:52BUFHenri Jokiharju: Delaying game puck over glass2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
49% to win51% to win
← BUF attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Thompson won the faceoff against Cirelli
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFTBL
23Shots on goal41
2.3Expected goals4.8
49Shot attempts68
29Faceoffs won24
2Power plays3
6Penalty minutes4
42Hits42
9Blocked shots13
3Giveaways11
5Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. Olofsson – Mittelstadt – Cozens2:16

    xG 0.29–0.24 (55%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  2. Okposo – Girgensons – Jost10:28

    xG 0.30–0.26 (53%)attempts 7–8goals 1–1

  3. Mittelstadt – Krebs – Quinn7:18

    xG 0.20–0.29 (41%)attempts 6–7goals 1–0

  4. Olofsson – Cozens – Peterka5:39

    xG 0.33–0.67 (33%)attempts 6–7goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. Jokiharju – Power17:43

    xG 0.75–0.90 (45%)attempts 15–15goals 0–0

  2. Bryson – Lyubushkin7:56

    xG 0.04–0.41 (9%)attempts 4–6goals 0–1

  3. Samuelsson – Dahlin19:20

    xG 1.02–1.50 (40%)attempts 18–22goals 2–2

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestMaroon – Paul – Colton9:37

    xG 0.80–0.22 (79%)attempts 12–6goals 1–0

  2. Kucherov – Point – Hagel7:30

    xG 0.83–0.44 (66%)attempts 12–7goals 0–1

  3. Stamkos – Kucherov – Point7:19

    xG 0.42–0.29 (59%)attempts 10–9goals 1–1

  4. Perry – Namestnikov – Bellemare8:09

    xG 0.25–0.26 (49%)attempts 5–3goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestCole – Fleury4:53

    xG 0.62–0.15 (80%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  2. Cernak – Sergachev7:08

    xG 0.51–0.15 (77%)attempts 5–3goals 1–0

  3. Hedman – Cernak3:28

    xG 0.24–0.04 (86%)attempts 4–2goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 4.8 xGBUF 2.3 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 99/100 · #18 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.78 · 11 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 30% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +39 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 84% of the time.

TBL winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).