Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 27, 2025·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

Pittsburgh Penguins 3, Buffalo Sabres 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 55% of the time.

BUF winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT1701227326
BUF21051208730

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:27BUFTage ThompsonAssists: Zach Benson, Rasmus Dahlin · Wrist, 0.11 xG0–1
  2. P1 4:44BUFPeyton KrebsAssists: Alex Tuch, Connor Clifton · Tip-in, 0.13 xG0–2
  3. P1 11:11PITSidney CrosbyAssists: Rickard Rakell, Matt Grzelcyk · Snap, 0.25 xG1–2
  4. P2 3:36BUFJiri KulichAssists: Bowen Byram, Tage Thompson · Snap, 0.18 xG1–3
  5. P2 5:20BUFMattias SamuelssonGWGAssists: Isak Rosen, Rasmus Dahlin · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–4
  6. P2 11:34BUFJiri KulichAssists: Bowen Byram, Jack Quinn · Snap, 0.07 xG1–5
  7. P2 12:02BUFTyson KozakAssists: Beck Malenstyn, Peyton Krebs · Backhand, 0.09 xG1–6
  8. P2 19:34BUFAlex TuchAssists: Owen Power, Tyson Kozak · Snap, 0.09 xG1–7
  9. P3 2:16PITBlake LizotteUnassisted · Other, 1.00 xG2–7
  10. P3 13:54PITKevin HayesAssists: Conor Timmins, Ryan Graves · Wrist, 0.13 xG3–7
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 6:41PITSidney Crosby: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 14:18BUFZach Benson: High sticking2 min
  3. P2 6:23BUFConnor Clifton: Interference2 min
  4. P2 9:32PITBlake Lizotte: High sticking2 min
  5. P2 18:05PITConnor Dewar: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 18:05BUFRasmus Dahlin: Roughing2 min
  7. P3 5:53PITConnor Dewar: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 5:53PITConnor Dewar: Fighting5 min
  9. P3 5:53BUFJacob Bernard-Docker: Fighting5 min
  10. P3 14:54PITVladislav Kolyachonok: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  11. P3 15:01BUFJiri Kulich: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
43% to win57% to win
← PIT attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Kulich
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITBUF
26Shots on goal30
2.8Expected goals2.5
49Shot attempts50
37Faceoffs won27
3Power plays4
15Penalty minutes13
28Hits15
8Blocked shots14
14Giveaways15
8Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. Hayes – Heinen – Dewar4:16

    xG 0.15–0.20 (43%)attempts 3–1goals 1–0

  2. Hayes – Dewar – Tomasino4:40

    xG 0.18–0.29 (39%)attempts 7–6goals 0–1

  3. Crosby – Rust – Rakell15:22

    xG 0.28–0.53 (35%)attempts 9–13goals 1–2

  4. Acciari – Koppanen – Lizotte10:33

    xG 0.09–0.51 (15%)attempts 6–10goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestKarlsson – Timmins10:51

    xG 0.68–0.13 (84%)attempts 14–5goals 0–0

  2. Letang – Grzelcyk12:45

    xG 1.46–0.93 (61%)attempts 15–15goals 2–4

  3. Shea – Timmins2:33

    xG 0.04–0.11 (28%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestThompson – Kulich – Benson11:40

    xG 0.74–0.12 (86%)attempts 12–11goals 2–0

  2. Malenstyn – Dunne – Kozak4:19

    xG 0.01–0.15 (4%)attempts 1–4goals 0–1

  3. McLeod – Quinn – Peterka8:54

    xG 0.27–0.64 (30%)attempts 4–9goals 0–1

  4. Tuch – Krebs – Rosen7:30

    xG 0.50–1.27 (28%)attempts 11–9goals 2–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestDahlin – Bernard-Docker2:26

    xG 0.10–0.04 (71%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  2. Bernard-Docker – Power9:12

    xG 0.23–0.22 (51%)attempts 5–11goals 0–1

  3. Clifton – Byram14:29

    xG 0.59–0.63 (49%)attempts 9–13goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 2.5 xGPIT 2.8 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 68/100 · #412 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.74 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 57% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +13 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 55% of the time.

BUF winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).