Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Apr 15, 2025·Amalie Arena, Tampa

Florida Panthers 1, Tampa Bay Lightning 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 85% of the time.

TBL winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
FLA0711007124
TBL38110113531

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:32TBLBrayden PointAssists: Yanni Gourde, J.J. Moser · Snap, 0.11 xG0–1
  2. P1 15:25TBLConor GeekieGWGAssists: Brayden Point, Victor Hedman · Slap, 0.11 xG0–2
  3. P1 18:09TBLJake GuentzelSHAssists: Anthony Cirelli · Snap, 0.25 xG0–3
  4. P2 4:42TBLNikita KucherovAssists: Yanni Gourde, Brayden Point · Snap, 0.13 xG0–4
  5. P2 5:36FLABrad MarchandAssists: Carter Verhaeghe, Matt Kiersted · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–4
  6. P3 11:22TBLDarren RaddyshPPAssists: Nikita Kucherov, Victor Hedman · Slap, 0.23 xG1–5
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 4:21FLANiko Mikkola: Interference2 min
  2. P1 12:58TBLErik Cernak: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 12:58FLAJaycob Megna: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 12:58TBLErik Cernak: Roughing2 min
  5. P1 16:02FLASam Bennett: High sticking2 min
  6. P1 17:11TBLBrandon Hagel: Interference2 min
  7. P1 17:11TBLBrandon Hagel: Abuse of officials2 min
  8. P2 6:17FLAMatt Kiersted: Hooking2 min
  9. P3 5:46TBLGage Goncalves: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  10. P3 8:28FLAJesse Puljujarvi: Match penalty5 min · PPG
  11. P3 8:28TBLConor Geekie: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 8:28FLANico Sturm: Fighting5 min
  13. P3 8:28TBLZemgus Girgensons: Fighting5 min
  14. P3 9:56FLANiko Mikkola: Holding the stick2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
43% to win57% to win
← FLA attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Cirelli won the faceoff against Bennett
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLATBL
24Shots on goal31
1.8Expected goals4.2
44Shot attempts61
18Faceoffs won19
4Power plays5
20Penalty minutes17
37Hits26
10Blocked shots8
18Giveaways14
5Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestRodrigues – Puljujarvi – Samoskevich3:34

    xG 0.22–0.15 (59%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  2. Puljujarvi – Luostarinen – Sturm4:03

    xG 0.18–0.16 (52%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

  3. Rodrigues – Boqvist – Samoskevich3:17

    xG 0.06–0.30 (17%)attempts 2–5goals 0–2

  4. Boqvist – Luostarinen – Sturm5:40

    xG 0.02–0.42 (4%)attempts 1–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKulikov – Balinskis4:47

    xG 0.21–0.10 (67%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  2. Kulikov – Schmidt2:52

    xG 0.09–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  3. Schmidt – Kiersted2:37

    xG 0.14–0.12 (54%)attempts 2–5goals 1–0

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestKucherov – Gourde – Point4:47

    xG 0.30–0.13 (70%)attempts 5–6goals 2–0

  2. Guentzel – Cirelli – Hagel7:44

    xG 0.61–0.45 (58%)attempts 9–7goals 0–1

  3. Girgensons – Chaffee – Goncalves2:11

    xG 0.12–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  4. Gourde – Girgensons – Chaffee2:17

    xG 0.09–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHedman – Moser5:43

    xG 0.66–0.04 (95%)attempts 11–2goals 1–0

  2. McDonagh – Cernak8:36

    xG 0.82–0.43 (65%)attempts 11–7goals 0–1

  3. Hedman – Raddysh3:23

    xG 0.32–0.17 (66%)attempts 5–4goals 2–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 4.2 xGFLA 1.8 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 13/100 · #1126 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.61 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 57% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +11 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 85% of the time.

TBL winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).