- Age
- 46
- Shoots
- Left
- Height
- 178 cm
- Weight
- 84 kg
- Born
- Edmonton, CAN
- Draft
- 1999, round 3, #91 (EDM)
Career · 2009–10 to 2010–11
- Games
- 64
- Goals
- 14
- Points
- 27
- TOI per game
- 13:27
- xGF% (5v5)
- 51.1%
- Goals above expected
- +0.6
Season by season
The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.
Form
Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.
Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.
Player card
How 2009–10 to 2010–11 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.
Overall rating
2nd line
67th percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.
- 1st line
- 2nd line
- 3rd line
- 4th line
- Extra / AHL
Scoring
2nd line- Goals /600.9878th pct
- Assists /600.9141st pct
- ixG /600.9479th pct
- Goals above expected+0.656th pct
Play-driving
2nd line- xGF% (5v5)51.1%59th pct
- CF% (5v5)52.6%75th pct
- Relative xGF%+2.166th pct
- Penalty diff /600.4276th pct
Usage
3rd line- TOI per game13:2736th pct
- PP time share33.8%57th pct
- Offensive zone starts69.6%91st pct
- Quality of competition23.7%23rd pct
Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how). This player is below the threshold, so the percentiles and ratings are for reference only.
Most similar players this season
Needs a regular role to compare.
Faceoffs
How often Comrie wins the draw over 2009–10 to 2010–11, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 405+ draws over the same seasons.
Win rate
46.0%
40–47 · below the 405 draws of a regular
Against an average centre
45.5%
Opponents won 49.5% of their draws; an average centre would have won 50.5% against them.
Wins above average
−4
Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.
Draws per game
2.4
87 draws in all.
By dot, attacking to the right
Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.
By zone
- Offensive zone41.9% 13–18
- Neutral zone62.1% 18–11
- Defensive zone33.3% 9–18
By strength
- Even strength44.3% 31–39
- Power play50.0% 8–8
What a win leads to
Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +15 after a win, +2 after a loss. Each win was worth -0.3 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.
Most-faced opponents
- Craig Conroy70.0% 7–3
- Daymond Langkow75.0% 3–1
- Dustin Boyd75.0% 3–1
- Claude Giroux75.0% 3–1
- Maxim Lapierre0.0% 0–3
- Paul Gaustad0.0% 0–3
- Frans Nielsen66.7% 2–1
- Mike Ribeiro50.0% 1–1
Season by season
| Season | Draws | Win rate | Against average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009–10 | 47 | 53.2% | 52.9% |
| 2010–11 | 40 | 37.5% | 36.7% |
Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.
+0.6 goals above expected
Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games