- Age
- 40
- Shoots
- Left
- Height
- 180 cm
- Weight
- 91 kg
- Born
- Fulton, USA
- Draft
- 2004, round 1, #25 (EDM)
Career · 2009–10 to 2010–11
- Games
- 107
- Goals
- 20
- Points
- 51
- TOI per game
- 13:59
- xGF% (5v5)
- 41.6%
- Goals above expected
- +3.8
Season by season
The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.
Form
Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.
Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.
Player card
How 2009–10 to 2010–11 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.
Overall rating
3rd line
39th percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.
- 1st line
- 2nd line
- 3rd line
- 4th line
- Extra / AHL
Scoring
2nd line- Goals /600.8058th pct
- Assists /601.2472nd pct
- ixG /600.6532nd pct
- Goals above expected+3.877th pct
Play-driving
4th line- xGF% (5v5)41.6%8th pct
- CF% (5v5)46.2%18th pct
- Relative xGF%−5.218th pct
- Penalty diff /600.5284th pct
Usage
3rd line- TOI per game13:5941st pct
- PP time share33.6%56th pct
- Offensive zone starts61.5%63rd pct
- Quality of competition24.1%37th pct
Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Most similar players this season
Faceoffs
How often Schremp wins the draw over 2009–10 to 2010–11, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 405+ draws over the same seasons.
Win rate
46.7%
411–470 · #137 of 179 regulars, 24th percentile
Against an average centre
46.4%
Opponents won 49.8% of their draws; an average centre would have won 50.2% against them.
Wins above average
−31
Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.
Draws per game
8.5
881 draws in all.
By dot, attacking to the right
Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.
By zone
- Offensive zone46.5% 138–159
- Neutral zone47.4% 152–169
- Defensive zone46.0% 121–142
By strength
- Even strength46.9% 363–411
- Power play47.5% 47–52
- Shorthanded25.0% 1–3
What a win leads to
Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +15 after a win, −10 after a loss. Each win was worth 1.6 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.
Most-faced opponents
- Mike Richards47.4% 9–10
- Patrice Bergeron22.2% 4–14
- Darren Helm43.8% 7–9
- Paul Gaustad28.6% 4–10
- Vincent Lecavalier78.6% 11–3
- Marc Savard53.8% 7–6
- Jesse Winchester38.5% 5–8
- Jason Arnott23.1% 3–10
Season by season
| Season | Draws | Win rate | Against average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009–10 | 395 | 47.3% | 47.3% |
| 2010–11 | 486 | 46.1% | 45.7% |
Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.
+3.8 goals above expected
Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games