Western Conference · Central Division
Utah Mammoth
2025–26·43–33–6·92 points·4th in the Central, 6th in the Western·Clinched playoff spot
- Points
- 92#18
- Goal differential
- +28#10
- xGF% (5v5, adj.)
- 53.7%#6
- Power play
- 20.0%#18
- Penalty kill
- 78.1%#19
- GSAx
- −3.3#20
Skaters
Everyone who played for the Mammoth. Traded players show only their games for this team. Use Columns for advanced stats.
 Clayton KellerRW · #9 | 82 | 26 | 62 | 88 | +21 | 19:05 | 225 | 11.6% | 27 | 28.9 | −2.9 | 56.7% |
 Nick SchmaltzC · #8 | 82 | 33 | 41 | 74 | +17 | 19:43 | 206 | 16.0% | 20 | 28.7 | +4.3 | 55.8% |
 Dylan GuentherRW · #11 | 79 | 40 | 33 | 73 | +7 | 17:24 | 242 | 16.5% | 24 | 29.8 | +10.2 | 53.6% |
 Mikhail SergachevD · #98 | 78 | 10 | 49 | 59 | +2 | 24:18 | 159 | 6.3% | 26 | 8.4 | +1.6 | 53.0% |
 JJ PeterkaRW · #77 | 82 | 25 | 22 | 47 | +6 | 15:59 | 159 | 15.7% | 5 | 18.5 | +6.5 | 52.5% |
 Lawson CrouseLW · #67 | 81 | 24 | 20 | 44 | +20 | 16:36 | 141 | 17.0% | 1 | 20.7 | +3.3 | 52.3% |
 Logan CooleyC · #92 | 54 | 24 | 19 | 43 | +3 | 17:20 | 102 | 23.5% | 10 | 15.7 | +8.3 | 52.9% |
 John MarinoD · #6 | 80 | 4 | 32 | 36 | +42 | 20:12 | 55 | 7.3% | 0 | 3.8 | +0.2 | 54.5% |
 Michael CarconeLW · #53 | 79 | 16 | 15 | 31 | +4 | 12:44 | 147 | 10.9% | 4 | 15.7 | +0.3 | 56.8% |
 Sean DurziD · #50 | 60 | 5 | 22 | 27 | −12 | 19:16 | 84 | 6.0% | 4 | 5.9 | −0.9 | 55.0% |
 Jack McBainC · #22 | 75 | 9 | 16 | 25 | +11 | 13:51 | 106 | 8.5% | 0 | 16.9 | −7.9 | 52.3% |
 Barrett HaytonC · #27 | 67 | 10 | 15 | 25 | +3 | 15:07 | 119 | 8.4% | 6 | 17.2 | −7.2 | 58.3% |
 Kailer YamamotoRW · #56 | 59 | 13 | 10 | 23 | +11 | 11:48 | 60 | 21.7% | 0 | 8.2 | +4.8 | 59.1% |
 Ian ColeD · #28 | 82 | 3 | 20 | 23 | +16 | 18:16 | 62 | 4.8% | 0 | 3.7 | −0.7 | 52.5% |
 Nate SchmidtD · #88 | 82 | 5 | 17 | 22 | +31 | 19:42 | 86 | 5.8% | 0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 54.9% |
 Kevin StenlundC · #82 | 80 | 4 | 14 | 18 | −9 | 14:29 | 66 | 6.1% | 0 | 8.6 | −4.6 | 45.6% |
 Alexander KerfootC · #15 | 34 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 0 | 12:47 | 28 | 25.0% | 0 | 3.4 | +3.6 | 53.5% |
 Nick DeSimoneD · #57 | 40 | 2 | 6 | 8 | +4 | 14:13 | 35 | 5.7% | 0 | 2.2 | −0.2 | 55.7% |
 Daniil ButLW · #19 | 29 | 3 | 4 | 7 | +1 | 12:28 | 43 | 7.0% | 3 | 6.5 | −3.5 | 59.3% |
 MacKenzie WeegarD · #52 · traded | 19 | 1 | 6 | 7 | +2 | 20:25 | 29 | 3.4% | 1 | 1.7 | −0.7 | 52.0% |
 Liam O'BrienC · #38 | 38 | 3 | 1 | 4 | −6 | 9:09 | 35 | 8.6% | 0 | 4.7 | −1.7 | 50.0% |
 Brandon TanevLW · #13 | 56 | 0 | 3 | 3 | −15 | 9:22 | 42 | 0.0% | 0 | 4.3 | −4.3 | 46.2% |
 Olli MaattaD · #3 · traded | 22 | 0 | 1 | 1 | −5 | 12:10 | 10 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.3 | −0.3 | 51.7% |
 Dmitri SimashevD · #26 | 28 | 0 | 1 | 1 | −11 | 15:06 | 26 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.1 | −1.1 | 47.5% |
 Kevin RooneyC · #25 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 9:44 | 1 | 100.0% | 0 | 0.2 | +0.8 | 53.3% |
 Maveric LamoureuxD · #10 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +4 | 14:39 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.2 | −0.2 | 43.9% |
 Andrew AgozzinoLW · #36 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6:08 | 0 | – | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 42.8% |
Goalies
Save percentage treats every shot alike; GSAx credits goalies for the difficulty of the shots they faced.
 Karel Vejmelka#70 | 64 | 63 | 38 | 20 | 3 | .897 | 2.75 | 2 | +4.1 | .731 |
 Vitek Vanecek#41 | 22 | 19 | 5 | 13 | 3 | .883 | 2.93 | 1 | −7.4 | .710 |
Player cards
Pick a player to see where they rank among everyone at their position, and who they most resemble statistically.
Overall rating
Starter
80th percentile among qualified goalies, blending goaltending 75%, usage 25%.
- Starter
- Backup
- Third string / AHL
Goaltending
Starter- Save %.89754th pct
- GSAx+4.160th pct
- GSAx /600.0760th pct
- High-danger SV%.73130th pct
- Medium-danger SV%.87377th pct
- Low-danger SV%.96530th pct
- Rebound control+0.9173rd pct
- GAA (lower is better)2.7561st pct
Usage
Starter- Games started6399th pct
- Shots faced /6026.4233rd pct
- xG faced /602.8134th pct
Percentiles among goalies with 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Most similar players this season
Who plays the tough minutes?
Coaches shelter some players with offensive-zone starts and weaker opponents, and trust others with the hardest assignments. Skaters with 100+ minutes at 5-on-5.
Across: share of zone starts in the attacking end (sheltered usage to the right). Up: quality of the opponents faced. Bubble size is 5-on-5 ice time; colour is relative xGF%, blue when the team does better with the player on the ice.