Skip to content
Ice Lab

Western Conference · Central Division

Utah Mammoth

2025–26·43–33–6·92 points·4th in the Central, 6th in the Western·Clinched playoff spot

Points
92#18
Goal differential
+28#10
xGF% (5v5, adj.)
53.7%#6
Power play
20.0%#18
Penalty kill
78.1%#19
GSAx
−3.3#20

Power play and penalty kill

The season: 46 power-play goals from 230 opportunities, and 54 conceded in 247 times shorthanded. Opportunities are the NHL's official count.

@ ANANov 17100%10.110100%
@ ANADec 32150%20.330100%
@ BOSDec 163133%50.64175%
@ BUFNov 4200%61.020100%
@ CARJan 29200%00.25260%
@ CBJMar 7100%20.120100%
@ CGYDec 6200%00.010100%
@ CGYApr 12300%40.540100%
@ CHIOct 13300%30.63167%
@ CHIMar 9200%00.24175%
@ COLOct 93133%50.34175%
@ COLDec 23300%40.420100%
@ DALNov 28200%20.25260%
@ DALMar 163133%20.130100%
@ DETDec 17400%20.34175%

Under the hood

Percentages hide how a power play works. These measure the chances it creates and allows per minute, and how quickly it gets set up.

How the special teams work

Each row places the team on the league's range; the tick is the league median. Blue dots are better than the median. For time to first attempt and PK xG against, lower is better.

Power-play xG per 60
7.37#20
Shots on goal per power play
1.34#28
Seconds to first attempt
41 s#22
Penalty-kill xG against per 60
7.82#19
Power-play %
20.0%#18
Penalty-kill %
78.1%#19

Power-play and penalty-kill shot locations

Model-based

Attempts per 60 minutes of power play (left) and penalty kill (right), compared with the league's average power play.

Where the shots come from, compared with the league

On the left, blue shows where this power play shoots more than a typical one. On the right, red shows where the penalty kill allows more.

On the power play

Fewer than league averageMore than league average(blue is good: more shots for)

On the penalty kill

Fewer than league averageMore than league average(red is bad: more shots against)