Wed, Feb 23, 2011·CONSOL Energy Center, Pittsburgh
San Jose Sharks 3, Pittsburgh Penguins 2 (OT)
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 77% of the time.
15%
69%
PIT winsSJS wins
Who was on the ice
Model-basedLine matchups and every shift of the game.
PIT forward lines and defence pairs (rows) against SJS's (columns) at 5-on-5. Darker cells shared more ice; the second number is xG for–against in that time. Click a cell to highlight it below.
| Thornton–Setoguchi–Couture | Wellwood–Pavelski–Mitchell | Marleau–Heatley–Clowe | Mayers–Eager–McCarthy | Mayers–Eager–Pavelski | Wellwood–Mitchell–McCarthy | Boyle–Murray | Vlasic–Demers | Wallin–White | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dupuis–Neal–Staal | 6:280.05–0.23 | 1:050.07–0.00 | 0:340.01–0.00 | 4:250.05–0.05 | 1:390.03–0.09 | 3:220.05–0.13 | |||
| Adams–Cooke–Kennedy | 2:110.00–0.09 | 3:400.05–0.03 | 2:020.02–0.09 | 1:340.00–0.00 | 2:220.41–0.03 | ||||
| Rupp–Talbot–Conner | 1:070.00–0.00 | 1:480.00–0.08 | 1:040.00–0.09 | 1:490.00–0.09 | 2:440.00–0.07 | ||||
| Sterling–Vitale–Wallace | 1:460.00–0.04 | 1:320.00–0.00 | 1:440.00–0.00 | 0:570.00–0.00 | 1:100.00–0.08 | ||||
| Kennedy–Neal–Staal | 1:090.00–0.00 | 0:310.01–0.00 | 1:070.01–0.00 | 0:550.00–0.00 | |||||
| Cooke–Talbot–Conner | 0:460.00–0.00 | 1:050.00–0.41 | |||||||
| Rupp–Vitale–Conner | 0:400.02–0.00 | 0:540.02–0.01 | |||||||
| Engelland–Michalek | 1:040.00–0.01 | 1:070.00–0.09 | 3:070.05–0.03 | 1:180.01–0.00 | 1:480.00–0.10 | 2:250.06–0.00 | 2:580.38–0.07 | ||
| Michalek–Niskanen | 0:480.00–0.09 | 2:140.05–0.00 | 0:310.00–0.00 | 0:400.02–0.00 | 2:260.03–0.00 | 2:010.04–0.00 | 1:300.02–0.12 | ||
| Letang–Lovejoy | 2:450.07–0.09 | 0:580.00–0.00 | 0:460.03–0.09 | 2:570.05–0.09 | 1:250.02–0.09 | ||||
| Niskanen–Lovejoy | 3:310.00–0.05 | 0:390.02–0.00 | 1:340.00–0.00 | 0:580.02–0.00 | 1:520.00–0.05 | ||||
| Orpik–Letang | 3:400.00–0.03 | 1:080.08–0.03 | 1:380.14–0.00 | 1:310.00–0.01 | |||||
| Niskanen–Letang | 1:050.00–0.04 | 1:110.00–0.07 | 0:570.08–0.03 | 1:140.00–0.01 | 1:290.02–0.07 | 1:480.08–0.06 | |||
| Engelland–Lovejoy | 0:490.00–0.00 | 1:200.00–0.00 | 0:560.00–0.00 | 2:090.00–0.00 | 0:460.00–0.00 | ||||
| Michalek–Lovejoy | 1:180.00–0.07 | 0:300.05–0.00 | 1:200.00–0.07 | 0:370.00–0.00 | 1:400.05–0.41 | ||||
| Engelland–Letang | 1:090.00–0.00 | 0:420.00–0.02 | 1:010.00–0.00 | 0:420.00–0.00 | 1:070.00–0.01 | ||||
| Michalek–Letang | 0:460.00–0.11 | 0:310.00–0.00 | 1:030.00–0.14 | ||||||
| Engelland–Niskanen | 0:360.00–0.03 | 0:530.00–0.03 |
Every shift, one row per player.
PITSJSFull-height lines are goals; short ticks at the top are shots. Hover to see who was on the ice.
Shift totals
| 30 | 31:21 | 1:03 | 2:26 | 4 | 2 | |
| 34 | 30:54 | 0:55 | 1:30 | 5 | 6 | |
| 28 | 29:04 | 1:02 | 1:52 | 4 | 5 | |
| 30 | 25:25 | 0:51 | 2:23 | 6 | 5 | |
| 32 | 23:12 | 0:44 | 1:55 | 8 | 4 | |
| 33 | 23:09 | 0:42 | 1:29 | 6 | 6 | |
| 27 | 22:57 | 0:51 | 1:46 | 6 | 6 | |
| 28 | 22:25 | 0:48 | 2:23 | 3 | 3 | |
| 29 | 22:17 | 0:46 | 1:39 | 4 | 3 | |
| 27 | 21:33 | 0:48 | 1:29 | 1 | 5 | |
| 26 | 20:51 | 0:48 | 1:43 | 4 | 1 | |
| 26 | 20:50 | 0:48 | 1:39 | 2 | 3 | |
| 24 | 20:48 | 0:52 | 1:34 | 4 | 1 | |
| 33 | 20:26 | 0:37 | 1:08 | 5 | 5 | |
| 26 | 19:33 | 0:45 | 1:28 | 2 | 3 | |
| 20 | 19:18 | 0:58 | 1:34 | 3 | 5 | |
| 26 | 19:15 | 0:44 | 1:29 | 5 | 1 | |
| 27 | 19:05 | 0:42 | 1:38 | 1 | 5 | |
| 25 | 19:03 | 0:46 | 1:33 | 3 | 3 | |
| 21 | 18:37 | 0:53 | 1:45 | 6 | 1 | |
| 27 | 17:46 | 0:39 | 1:12 | 4 | 2 | |
| 29 | 17:45 | 0:37 | 0:59 | 5 | 2 | |
| 23 | 15:50 | 0:41 | 1:26 | 1 | 2 | |
| 19 | 14:07 | 0:45 | 1:35 | 3 | 3 | |
| 21 | 13:58 | 0:40 | 1:23 | 3 | 3 | |
| 18 | 13:28 | 0:45 | 1:10 | 2 | 2 | |
| 19 | 13:02 | 0:41 | 1:01 | 2 | 1 | |
| 14 | 10:46 | 0:46 | 1:15 | 3 | 0 | |
| 15 | 9:56 | 0:40 | 1:02 | 0 | 4 | |
| 13 | 9:55 | 0:46 | 1:06 | 2 | 1 | |
| 11 | 9:43 | 0:53 | 1:12 | 2 | 3 | |
| 10 | 7:30 | 0:45 | 1:07 | 0 | 3 | |
| 16 | 6:59 | 0:26 | 0:53 | 0 | 2 | |
| 12 | 6:28 | 0:32 | 1:04 | 0 | 1 | |
| 9 | 5:43 | 0:38 | 1:10 | 0 | 1 | |
| 10 | 5:36 | 0:34 | 0:53 | 0 | 0 |