Mon, Mar 28, 2016·Gila River Arena, Glendale
Calgary Flames 5, Arizona Coyotes 2
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 63% of the time.
28%
9%
9%
54%
ARI winsCGY wins
Who was on the ice
Model-basedLine matchups and every shift of the game.
ARI forward lines and defence pairs (rows) against CGY's (columns) at 5-on-5. Darker cells shared more ice; the second number is xG for–against in that time. Click a cell to highlight it below.
| Grant–Shinkaruk–Monahan | Frolik–Backlund–Poirier | Stajan–Bouma–Bollig | Colborne–Ferland–Bennett | Colborne–Bouma–Bennett | Backlund–Shinkaruk–Poirier | Engelland–Giordano | Brodie–Hamilton | Kulak–Nakladal | Engelland–Brodie | Engelland–Kulak | Brodie–Nakladal | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gordon–Martinook–Plotnikov | 2:230.19–0.00 | 3:150.01–0.02 | 1:510.00–0.01 | 1:060.02–0.00 | 0:360.00–0.06 | 0:360.00–0.00 | 3:230.06–0.01 | 1:490.02–0.06 | 4:480.13–0.03 | |||
| Hanzal–Duclair–Domi | 3:490.00–0.07 | 2:220.00–0.18 | 4:020.00–0.24 | 3:230.00–0.03 | 0:390.00–0.08 | |||||||
| Tanguay–Vermette–Tikhonov | 1:320.03–0.00 | 0:520.00–0.03 | 0:470.02–0.00 | 1:470.19–0.03 | 1:340.03–0.00 | 2:250.05–0.03 | 1:200.18–0.03 | 1:170.00–0.14 | ||||
| Tanguay–Vermette–Sekac | 0:440.12–0.00 | 2:190.10–0.00 | 1:150.00–0.17 | 1:090.01–0.00 | 2:420.21–0.00 | 1:030.00–0.00 | ||||||
| Richardson–Rieder–Duclair | 0:420.00–0.14 | 1:340.02–0.00 | 1:220.14–0.00 | 0:420.02–0.00 | 2:280.14–0.15 | 0:480.00–0.14 | ||||||
| Richardson–Rieder–Sekac | 0:380.02–0.00 | 1:060.12–0.00 | 1:160.01–0.16 | 1:460.13–0.00 | ||||||||
| Richardson–Tikhonov–Rieder | 0:340.03–0.00 | 0:370.00–0.00 | 2:040.00–0.05 | 1:240.00–0.00 | 2:020.03–0.05 | |||||||
| Hanzal–Domi–Sekac | 0:400.00–0.00 | 0:320.00–0.12 | 0:560.00–0.00 | 0:310.00–0.32 | 0:540.00–0.00 | 1:210.00–0.32 | 0:480.00–0.12 | |||||
| Ekman-Larsson–Murphy | 4:480.09–0.22 | 3:050.02–0.01 | 1:140.00–0.00 | 5:290.19–0.53 | 6:550.06–0.23 | 5:200.09–0.47 | 3:560.18–0.18 | 1:130.00–0.02 | 1:100.00–0.14 | |||
| Michalek–Connauton | 4:240.37–0.01 | 4:500.03–0.29 | 4:120.19–0.00 | 1:440.14–0.03 | 0:410.00–0.06 | 5:250.05–0.17 | 8:000.53–0.11 | 3:070.16–0.12 | 0:400.00–0.08 | |||
| Grossmann–Dahlbeck | 1:240.16–0.00 | 1:520.02–0.05 | 3:520.12–0.01 | 2:230.00–0.17 | 0:310.00–0.00 | 3:190.06–0.00 | 2:030.11–0.00 | 5:320.13–0.06 | 0:410.00–0.17 |
Every shift, one row per player.
ARICGYFull-height lines are goals; short ticks at the top are shots. Hover to see who was on the ice.
Shift totals
| 29 | 25:44 | 0:53 | 2:58 | 4 | 1 | |
| 31 | 23:57 | 0:46 | 1:23 | 3 | 8 | |
| 29 | 23:49 | 0:49 | 1:31 | 2 | 3 | |
| 28 | 22:13 | 0:48 | 1:32 | 5 | 5 | |
| 30 | 21:15 | 0:43 | 1:40 | 2 | 1 | |
| 30 | 21:08 | 0:42 | 1:10 | 4 | 6 | |
| 27 | 19:18 | 0:43 | 1:18 | 5 | 4 | |
| 28 | 19:11 | 0:41 | 1:24 | 4 | 5 | |
| 21 | 18:20 | 0:52 | 2:07 | 7 | 2 | |
| 20 | 17:25 | 0:52 | 1:56 | 5 | 2 | |
| 20 | 17:06 | 0:51 | 2:10 | 5 | 3 | |
| 23 | 17:03 | 0:44 | 1:10 | 4 | 3 | |
| 24 | 16:45 | 0:42 | 1:31 | 1 | 9 | |
| 18 | 16:09 | 0:54 | 1:31 | 2 | 0 | |
| 22 | 16:09 | 0:44 | 1:20 | 6 | 3 | |
| 25 | 16:01 | 0:38 | 1:31 | 4 | 7 | |
| 23 | 15:55 | 0:42 | 1:18 | 1 | 2 | |
| 19 | 15:36 | 0:49 | 1:21 | 2 | 0 | |
| 19 | 15:32 | 0:49 | 1:11 | 4 | 1 | |
| 21 | 15:22 | 0:44 | 1:19 | 1 | 1 | |
| 21 | 15:00 | 0:43 | 1:14 | 1 | 3 | |
| 22 | 14:56 | 0:41 | 1:37 | 3 | 6 | |
| 23 | 14:55 | 0:39 | 1:09 | 1 | 2 | |
| 18 | 14:34 | 0:49 | 1:13 | 3 | 1 | |
| 22 | 14:34 | 0:40 | 1:20 | 1 | 4 | |
| 20 | 14:33 | 0:44 | 1:30 | 1 | 0 | |
| 21 | 14:30 | 0:41 | 1:14 | 2 | 4 | |
| 21 | 14:03 | 0:40 | 1:09 | 4 | 1 | |
| 19 | 13:41 | 0:43 | 1:13 | 2 | 2 | |
| 19 | 13:35 | 0:43 | 1:20 | 2 | 1 | |
| 20 | 12:59 | 0:39 | 1:26 | 1 | 1 | |
| 15 | 12:44 | 0:51 | 1:11 | 3 | 1 | |
| 19 | 12:42 | 0:40 | 1:06 | 1 | 1 | |
| 18 | 12:11 | 0:41 | 1:14 | 2 | 2 | |
| 19 | 12:03 | 0:38 | 0:58 | 2 | 4 | |
| 18 | 11:55 | 0:40 | 1:06 | 1 | 1 |