Skip to content
Ice Lab

Western Conference · Pacific Division

San Jose Sharks

2022–23·22–44–16·60 points·7th in the Pacific, 14th in the Western

Points
60#29
Goal differential
−82#29
xGF% (5v5, adj.)
49.1%#22
Power play
18.4%#25
Penalty kill
82.4%#8
GSAx
−39.4#31

Power play and penalty kill

The season: 41 power-play goals from 223 opportunities, and 43 conceded in 244 times shorthanded. Opportunities are the NHL's official count.

@ ANADec 94125%70.930100%
@ ANAJan 6200%10.640100%
@ ARIJan 10200%20.240100%
@ ARIApr 17343%121.82150%
@ BOSJan 22200%00.04175%
@ BUFDec 411100%30.34250%
@ CARJan 27200%40.52150%
@ CBJJan 21100%30.42150%
@ CGYMar 25300%20.210100%
@ CGYApr 12200%30.310100%
@ CHIJan 1300%20.430100%
@ COLMar 7300%20.25180%
@ DALNov 112150%50.610100%
@ DALDec 31400%10.73233%
@ DETJan 24100%20.120100%

Under the hood

Percentages hide how a power play works. These measure the chances it creates and allows per minute, and how quickly it gets set up.

How the special teams work

Each row places the team on the league's range; the tick is the league median. Blue dots are better than the median. For time to first attempt and PK xG against, lower is better.

Power-play xG per 60
7.34#20
Shots on goal per power play
1.50#17
Seconds to first attempt
41 s#22
Penalty-kill xG against per 60
7.16#9
Power-play %
18.4%#25
Penalty-kill %
82.4%#8

Power-play and penalty-kill shot locations

Model-based

Attempts per 60 minutes of power play (left) and penalty kill (right), compared with the league's average power play.

Where the shots come from, compared with the league

On the left, blue shows where this power play shoots more than a typical one. On the right, red shows where the penalty kill allows more.

On the power play

Fewer than league averageMore than league average(blue is good: more shots for)

On the penalty kill

Fewer than league averageMore than league average(red is bad: more shots against)