Skip to content
Ice Lab

Western Conference · Pacific Division

San Jose Sharks

2024–25·20–50–12·52 points·8th in the Pacific, 16th in the Western·Eliminated

Points
52#32
Goal differential
−102#32
xGF% (5v5, adj.)
43.0%#31
Power play
18.6%#26
Penalty kill
74.2%#27
GSAx
−24.1#30

Power play and penalty kill

The season: 42 power-play goals from 226 opportunities, and 66 conceded in 256 times shorthanded. Opportunities are the NHL's official count.

@ ANAOct 222150%40.46267%
@ ANAApr 1200%30.54175%
@ BOSJan 20100%10.62150%
@ BUFMar 4200%41.22150%
@ CARDec 10300%10.240100%
@ CBJJan 16300%40.320100%
@ CGYFeb 23300%60.66183%
@ CGYApr 13200%70.520100%
@ CHIOct 17300%20.27271%
@ COLMar 65240%112.04325%
@ DALOct 15300%40.740100%
@ DALNov 20300%40.440100%
@ DETJan 1411100%20.220100%
@ EDMDec 21100%00.120100%
@ EDMApr 11200%10.45260%

Under the hood

Percentages hide how a power play works. These measure the chances it creates and allows per minute, and how quickly it gets set up.

How the special teams work

Each row places the team on the league's range; the tick is the league median. Blue dots are better than the median. For time to first attempt and PK xG against, lower is better.

Power-play xG per 60
7.38#23
Shots on goal per power play
1.34#25
Seconds to first attempt
39 s#12
Penalty-kill xG against per 60
9.74#32
Power-play %
18.6%#26
Penalty-kill %
74.2%#27

Power-play and penalty-kill shot locations

Model-based

Attempts per 60 minutes of power play (left) and penalty kill (right), compared with the league's average power play.

Where the shots come from, compared with the league

On the left, blue shows where this power play shoots more than a typical one. On the right, red shows where the penalty kill allows more.

On the power play

Fewer than league averageMore than league average(blue is good: more shots for)

On the penalty kill

Fewer than league averageMore than league average(red is bad: more shots against)