Skip to content
Ice Lab

Western Conference · Pacific Division

San Jose Sharks

2018–19·46–27–9·101 points·2nd in the Pacific, 2nd in the Western·Clinched playoff spot

Points
101#6
Goal differential
+31#7
xGF% (5v5, adj.)
54.2%#3
Power play
23.7%#6
Penalty kill
80.8%#15
GSAx
−25.1#28

Power play and penalty kill

The season: 57 power-play goals from 241 opportunities, and 45 conceded in 234 times shorthanded. Opportunities are the NHL's official count.

@ ANAOct 28200%50.710100%
@ ANAMar 225120%51.23233%
@ ARIDec 8100%20.3110%
@ ARIJan 163133%50.64175%
@ BOSFeb 263133%30.64175%
@ BUFNov 273133%60.310100%
@ CAROct 263267%20.920100%
@ CBJFeb 23200%10.42150%
@ CGYDec 314250%40.54175%
@ CGYFeb 73133%51.07186%
@ CHIDec 1622100%111.440100%
@ COLJan 23267%50.54175%
@ DALNov 8300%60.410100%
@ DALDec 7200%40.320100%
@ DETFeb 243133%40.520100%

Under the hood

Percentages hide how a power play works. These measure the chances it creates and allows per minute, and how quickly it gets set up.

How the special teams work

Each row places the team on the league's range; the tick is the league median. Blue dots are better than the median. For time to first attempt and PK xG against, lower is better.

Power-play xG per 60
7.86#3
Shots on goal per power play
1.63#4
Seconds to first attempt
38 s#4
Penalty-kill xG against per 60
7.33#24
Power-play %
23.7%#6
Penalty-kill %
80.8%#15

Power-play and penalty-kill shot locations

Model-based

Attempts per 60 minutes of power play (left) and penalty kill (right), compared with the league's average power play.

Where the shots come from, compared with the league

On the left, blue shows where this power play shoots more than a typical one. On the right, red shows where the penalty kill allows more.

On the power play

Fewer than league averageMore than league average(blue is good: more shots for)

On the penalty kill

Fewer than league averageMore than league average(red is bad: more shots against)